Omni Institute

Omni Institute Omni Institute Omni Institute

Omni Institute

Omni Institute Omni Institute Omni Institute
  • Home
  • Public Diagnostics
  • OMSR/OSIE Framework
  • Institutions
  • Predictive Structural

Market Research Solutions for MyOmni

Structural Diagnostics for Modern Systems Prepared by MyOmni Institute myomni.io

OMSR/OSIE FRAMEWORK

The Structural Intelligence Standard

OMSR/OSIE is the first diagnostic framework designed to measure whether modern economic systems heal or harm the broader economy as they scale.

It evaluates systems not by financial performance, but by:

  • how much economic burden they create or remove,
  • how efficiently they convert resources into real-world output,
  • and how their growth affects systemic fragility or stability.

This framework is used to assess corporations, industries, governments, and digital infrastructures across four structural layers:

Operational, Social, Industrial, and Economic.

What OMSR/OSIE Measures

OMSR and OSIE are complementary structural-analysis frameworks that evaluate how systems affect real-world economic stability—not stock prices, investor returns, or market sentiment.

They measure:

  • logistics burden
  • administrative overhead
  • risk displacement
  • resource conversion
  • scaling behavior
  • fragility amplification
  • net capacity added or extracted

These frameworks reveal whether a system is regenerative, neutral, or extractive.

OSIE — Operational, Social, Industrial, Economic Index

OSIE evaluates a system across four structural layers:

Operational Layer (O)

Measures:

  • routing density
  • burn-rate pressure
  • contractor dependence
  • logistical friction
  • supply-chain stress

Negative results indicate that operational expansion increases total system burden.

Social Layer (S)

Assesses:

  • behavioral dependencies
  • reliance on frictionless services
  • time-displacement
  • household fragility
  • outsourcing patterns

Shows whether a system strengthens or weakens social resilience.

Industrial Layer (I)

Examines alignment with:

  • infrastructure
  • energy capacity
  • physical output
  • manufacturing/logistics readiness

Negative scores indicate digital demand growing faster than industrial capacity.

Economic Layer (E)

Measures:

  • fee structures
  • cross-subsidies
  • inflation pass-through
  • capital recycling
  • ecosystem distortion

Shows whether the system redistributes cost or produces net value.

OMSR — Output, Model, Stability, Risk Index

OMSR captures the structural behavior of a system:

Output (O)

Evaluates how efficiently a system converts:

  • capital → real output
  • labor → delivered value
  • logistics → fulfillment

Inefficiency reveals embedded friction or waste.

Model  (M)

Assesses:

  • model coherence
  • circular dependencies
  • subsidy reliance
  • administrative overhead
  • portfolio architecture

Extractive models score lower; regenerative models score higher.

Stability (S)

Measures:

  • fragility
  • counter-party risk
  • exposure concentration
  • volatility sensitivity

Low stability indicates systems that cannot withstand macro stress.

Risk (R)

Evaluates:

  • hidden liabilities
  • off-balance-sheet exposure 
  • systemic contagion
  • multi-sector risk displacement

High negative R = high systemic danger.

How the Indices Work Together

The following scoring bands provide a public interpretation of the OSIE composite (−100 to +100).


OSIE reveals the burden a system places on the world.


OMSR reveals how the system behaves structurally.



Together, they identify:

  • extractive vs. regenerative systems
  • structural leakage
  • fragility amplification nodes
  • collapse-risk entities
  • long-term economic impact


The public composite score (−100 to +100) is a proprietary weighted blend of ELI, PEI, and PLD, calibrated against historical regenerative and extractive benchmarks (e.g., Toyota Production System, 2008 financial-crisis nodes).


Index Definitions


ELI — External Leakage Index

Measures economic burden displaced onto:

  • households
  • municipalities
  • banks
  • supply chains

High negative ELI = structural extraction.

PEI — Productive Efficiency Index

Measures:

  • output efficiency
  • delivery consistency
  • innovation density
  • resource utilization

Low PEI = waste-driven or speculative models.

PLD — Portfolio Leakage Density

Measures:

  • concentration risk
  • correlated exposures
  • contagion potential

Low PLD = portfolio architecture that amplifies system fragility.

Composite OSIE Score

A single structural-health indicator blending ELI, PEI, and PLD.

Composite Score Bands (Public Reference Table)

Score Range Classification Structural Interpretation


+60 to +100 Regenerative System Adds net capacity; strengthens economy as it scales.


+20 to +59 Positive Contributor Minor leakage, net positive structural impact.


Reference table current as of November 2025 — subject to periodic recalibration based on new structural benchmarks


–19 to +19 Neutral / Balanced Friction roughly equals contribution.


–20 to –59 Extractive System Burdens infrastructure & households; increases fragility.


–60 to –100 Severe Extractor / Risk Node High leakage, systemic fragility, collapse-risk behavior.


Why the Framework Exists

Modern economies increasingly rely on:

  • digital intermediaries
  • convenience platforms
  • externalized labor
  • last-mile logistics
  • layered administrative systems

Traditional financial metrics cannot detect:

  • structural leakage 
  • systemic burden
  • supply-chain distortion
  • risk displacement
  • municipal fragility

OMSR/OSIE fills the gap by evaluating economic structure over economic narrative.


Legal Notice & Disclaimer

This page describes the OMSR/OSIE framework at a high level.

It does not disclose proprietary computational design, weighting methodology, or internal modeling tools.

OMSR/OSIE diagnostics are structural interpretations of public data.

They do not constitute:

  • investment advice
  • credit ratings
  • solvency assessments
  • market forecasts
  • allegations of wrongdoing

© 2025 MyOmni Institute — All Rights Reserved.

Questions or research requests: contact@myomni.io

Contact Us


(APPLIES TO ALL REPORTS)


Legal Notice & Disclaimer

This report is an independent structural assessment prepared using the OMSR/OSIE analytical framework.

It reflects the system-level interpretation of publicly available operational, economic, and industry data at the time of publication.

This document does not contain or constitute:

  • investment advice
  • financial recommendations
  • legal guidance
  • claims of misconduct
  • statements of intent
  • predictive certainty
  • insider information

OMSR/OSIE evaluates economic structure, not ethics, management, or character.

Scores represent structural impact trends only, not judgments of value, legitimacy, solvency, or future performance.

All findings are:

  • analytical opinions, not factual allegations
  • non-actionable, and intended solely for research and educational purposes
  • based on publicly sourced information believed to be reliable but not independently verified

MyOmni Institute makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information contained herein.

No party should make financial, operational, regulatory, or legal decisions based solely on this report.

By accessing this report, you agree that:

  • MyOmni Institute and its contributors are not liable for any damages, losses, or decisions arising from its use
  • OMSR/OSIE outputs are interpretive research, protected under free expression and academic analysis standards

© 2025 MyOmni Institute — All rights reserved.

Reproduction, distribution, or modification requires written permission.


Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept